Errors in carbon 14 dating

Radiometric dating techniques are thus based on sound scientific principles, but rely on so many basic assumptions that Bible believers need not have their faith shattered by data derived from these techniques. What do rock layers on the Earth's crust tell us about our origins and the age of the earth? Many examples from literature show that the zero-reset assumption is not always valid.Volcanic ejecta of Mount Rangitoto (Auckland, New Zealand) was found to have a potassium-40 age of 485,000 years, yet trees buried within the volcanic material were dated with the carbon-14 method to be less than 300 years old.Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.

d) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without knowledge of the exact ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14in the initial sample, the dating technique is subject to question.

Carbon-14 comes from nitrogen and is independent of the carbon-12 reservoir.

If even a small percentage of the limestone deposits were still in the form of living marine organisms at the time of the Flood, then the small amount of carbon-14 would have mixed with a much larger carbon-12 reservoir, thus resulting in a drastically reduced ratio.

They will argue that the clock was not reset if the age is too old, or that isotopes were selectively removed if the age turns out to be too young.

In the study on the Hawaii lava flow cited above, it was argued that entrapment of excessive amounts of argon gas had made the samples appear older than they were.

Search for errors in carbon 14 dating:

errors in carbon 14 dating-16errors in carbon 14 dating-52

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “errors in carbon 14 dating”

  1. Not so much by the public (although there are certainly scientists on some space missions that I will not name who like to try to exert control over what the public may say about their photos), but more by other scientists.